Infrastructure Pricing

Three paths to own
your AI stack.

Every Avalon deployment runs the same software. The choice is where the hardware lives, who owns it, and how you want to scale. Cloud infrastructure is billed direct from vendors to Avalon with no markup.

Swift Innovation September 2026 Re-quote GPUs weekly Confidential
3
Deployment options
6-7 mo
GPU payback vs. rental
$183k
36-mo savings
Section 1

Three deployment options. One software stack.

Every client gets the same stack. The choice is where the hardware lives. Swift's default recommendation is colocation: Avalon owns the hardware and gets real redundancy without needing a server-ready building. Cloud is always available as a starting point; a move to owned hardware requires no software rebuild.

Option 1
On-Premises
Hardware in Avalon's own building. Highest sovereignty. Lowest monthly cost. Requires a stable office and IT-ready team. Client and session data never leaves the building.
Option 2 (Recommended)
Colocation
Avalon-owned hardware in a data center rack. Full ownership without building risk. Real redundancy built in. Best default for most clients who want sovereignty without managing a server room.
Option 3
Cloud
Rented servers on DigitalOcean. No upfront hardware cost. Highest monthly cost at scale. Identical software stack; can move to owned hardware at any point with no rebuild required.
On-premisesColocationCloud
Hardware owner AvalonAvalonProvider
Cost pattern Upfront, low monthly Upfront + rack fee No upfront, highest monthly
Local AI inference Yes, owned GPUs Yes, owned GPUs Rented or via Swift
Data sovereignty HighestHighLowest
Section 2

Six server roles behind one gateway.

Same names on-premises, in colo, and in the cloud. Runbooks and monitoring work identically everywhere. Avalon holds the ArcVault root key from day one in every option. Swift's access is scoped, logged, and removable at any time.

RoleWhat it does
ArcGate Firewall, VPN, network zones, DNS
ArcHelm Kubernetes, Avalon web and API, Surface
ArcData Postgres (client and stylist profiles), Neo4j (knowledge graph), ClickHouse (session analytics), object storage (hair assets, renders)
ArcVault Keys, secrets, Ledger. Avalon holds root key from day one in every option.
ArcRig GPU inference: hair visualization rendering, texture transfer models, style recommendation, fine-tuning
ArcBuild CI runners, preview environments, agent build lanes
Section 3

Cloud infrastructure costs, billed direct, no markup.

These costs apply during the build phase for all options, and as the full ongoing cost for Option 3 (cloud-first). All accounts registered to Avalon. Figures verified against DigitalOcean and Cloudflare current rates (Sept 2026); re-confirm at proposal time.

Dev AI Tooling (during build)
Tier 1: 1 developer~$1,000 / mo
Tier 2: 2 developers~$2,000 / mo
Tier 3: 3 developers~$3,000 / mo
Rate per developer$1,000 / mo
Includes frontier model API access, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, and AI-powered CI. All accounts registered to Avalon.
Cloud Infrastructure (DigitalOcean + Cloudflare)
App + API (2 nodes, 4 vCPU / 16 GB each)$252
Managed Postgres HA (client and stylist profiles)$122
Neo4j (knowledge graph, style patterns)$168
ClickHouse (session analytics + telemetry)$63
Object storage R2 (hair assets, renders)$15
CDN, DNS, monitoring, CI/CD runners$75
Est. during build~$695 / mo
Post-launch base: ~$1,300/mo. Scales with active users, style catalog size, and rendering load. All cloud accounts registered to Avalon; zero platform take-rate.
Cost itemPhaseMonthlyWho pays
Dev AI toolingAPIs, Claude Code, Copilot, CI, per developer on the engagement During build $1,000 / dev Avalon
Cloud infrastructure (build phase)App/API, Postgres, Neo4j, ClickHouse, storage, CDN During build ~$695 Avalon
Cloud infrastructure (post-launch)Scales with user base and rendering load Post-launch ~$1,300+ Avalon
Ownership: Every cloud account (DigitalOcean, Cloudflare) is registered under Avalon credentials from day one. Swift has scoped access for deployment and monitoring; access is logged and removable. No vendor lock-in: the full stack runs on standard infrastructure any engineer can take over.
Section 4

On-premises and colocation hardware (Options 1 and 2).

Hardware is identical across on-prem and colo. Colocation adds a monthly rack fee; the client's building costs are removed. Get vendor quotes before any number goes into a proposal. GPU hardware is priced separately in Section 5.

TierUsers / Agent lanesServer hardwareColo monthly (half rack, 5 kW)
Small Under 25 users, 1-2 lanes ~60% of Standard Market rate, 2-3 local quotes
Standard 25-75 users, 3 lanes $30,000-$91,000 Market rate, 2-3 local quotes
Large 75+ users, 6+ lanes ~175% of Standard Market rate, 2-3 local quotes
Hardware sourcing: The $30,000 floor assumes certified refurbished servers (Techbuyer, ServerMonkey, eBay Business). The $91,000 ceiling is all-new. Compute nodes (ArcHelm, ArcBuild) and switches are good candidates for refurbished. UPS units, PDUs, and ArcVault nodes should be new or under current warranty; power protection and key storage are not places to accept unknown service history.
Section 5

GPU options for the Hair Intelligence Engine.

GPU hardware powers Avalon's Hair Intelligence Engine: real-time visualization rendering, texture transfer model inference, style recommendation, and fine-tuning on Avalon's style catalog. GPU prices must be re-verified the week each proposal is sent.

Starter Build
~$13,000
2x RTX 5090 (32 GB each)
Fits 1-2 agent lanes, launch scale. Runs 70B-class models and real-time visualization. Cards can be upgraded later without replacing server hardware.
Standard Build (Recommended)
~$39,000
2x RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q (96 GB each)
Fits 3-6 agent lanes. 192 GB total VRAM. Runs texture transfer and recommendation models simultaneously. Covers the full Hair Intelligence stack at scale.
Heavy Build
~$78,000-$83,000
4x RTX PRO 6000 Server Edition (96 GB each)
384 GB total VRAM. Multiple large models serving many agent lanes, high-concurrency rendering, and fine-tuning in parallel. Server Edition is passive-cooled for rack use.
GPU memoryRuns well (4-bit quantized)
64 GB (2x RTX 5090) 70B-class models: style recommendation, cataloging, structured drafting
96-192 GB (1-2x RTX PRO 6000) Texture transfer models, 70B at higher quality, several models simultaneously
384 GB (4x RTX PRO 6000) Multiple large models serving many agent lanes, concurrent rendering, and fine-tuning in parallel
Re-quote rule: GPU prices have roughly doubled since launch as AI data centers absorbed the world's memory supply. The September 2026 numbers above are a floor, not a ceiling. Every GPU number must be re-verified the week the proposal is sent.
Section 6

Frontier API baseline: what the platform costs today.

What Avalon pays for AI before any owned inference hardware. Frontier API and SaaS tooling scale linearly with team and agent count. They do not decrease as usage grows; unlike owned hardware, they carry no fixed ceiling.

AI-Assisted Development (full stack)
Raw API usage per developer$100-$300 / mo
Claude Code + GitHub Copilot~$400 / mo
AI-powered CI tooling~$300 / mo
All-in per developer~$1,000 / mo
Autonomous Agent Lanes
Business hours only (~8 hr/day)$500-$1,500 / lane
24/7 lane$1,500-$3,000 / lane
3 lanes 24/7 (example)$6,000 / mo
Frontier API and SaaS tooling costs scale linearly with every new developer and agent lane added. Owned hardware costs are fixed once purchased; every additional agent lane after payback is near-zero marginal cost.
Section 7

The ownership argument.

The core case for buying hardware rather than renting cloud GPUs indefinitely. Scenario: Standard ArcRig build vs. renting equivalent H100 compute from DigitalOcean through Swift.

Frontier API monthly
$6,000
3 agent lanes at ~$2,000/lane/mo. Scales with every new lane added.
Owned inference monthly
~$1,100
Standard ArcRig amortized over 3 years (~$54k total hardware). Near-zero marginal cost after payback period.
Annual savings
~$59,000
Hardware pays itself back in 8-10 months. Everything after is inference at near-zero marginal cost.
ComparisonDO base rate2x GPU 24/7 (base)Cost to Avalon
H100 on-demand (DO) $4.41/GPU/hr $6,440/mo $8,370/mo
H100 reserved 12-month (DO) $3.26/GPU/hr $4,760/mo $6,190/mo
Standard ArcRig owned (2x RTX PRO 6000) $39,000 one-time hardware ~$1,100/mo amortized
Standard ArcRig vs. reserved DO H100 through Swift ($6,190/mo): payback in 6-7 months. Every month after that is ~$6,190 kept. Over 36 months, owned hardware saves approximately $183,000 vs reserved H100 rental, before power costs.
Section 8

Own or borrow from Swift: start anywhere, move anytime.

Avalon can borrow any component from Swift's Grid until usage justifies owning it. The software stack is identical regardless of which option is chosen. Moving from borrowed to owned requires no rebuild at any point.

ComponentAvalon ownsBorrowed from Swift
Brain (ArcRouter + models) Runs on Avalon ArcRig; all client data stays in Avalon infrastructure Avalon apps call Swift's Grid through ArcRouter; no GPUs needed
Vault (keys, secrets, Ledger) Runs on Avalon ArcVault nodes Swift hosts it; Avalon receives SDK and scoped keys
Surface workspace Runs on Avalon ArcHelm Workspace on Swift's Surface instance
Build pipeline Runs on Avalon ArcBuild nodes Builds run on Swift's runners, billed per use
Section 9

Proposal and re-quote rules.

Hardware costs are planning estimates; get vendor quotes before any number goes into a final proposal. Labor retainers are quoted separately.

ItemRule
GPU prices Re-verify the week the proposal is sent. RTX PRO 6000 prices have been volatile; September 2026 figures are a floor, not a ceiling.
Server hardware Re-confirm within 30 days. Get vendor quotes before any number goes into a final proposal.
Colocation rack fees Get 2-3 local quotes per proposal. Rates vary by market and facility tier.
Cloud compute Confirm ArcBuild node count against Avalon's actual agent lanes before finalizing. Section 3 figures are based on verified DO rates (Sept 2026).
Markup basis Cloud accounts billed at vendor rate with no markup. Labor retainers are a separate line item in every proposal.